Skip to main content

Get to 61

61 seats61 to govern

Final count as of Oct 30, 12:00 AM GMT+2. Seats calculated from the full count.Source

Red lines in this lineup

  • Ra'amTogether (Bennett-Lapid)Yisrael Beytenu

    The Ra'am red line

    One side has explicitly ruled out relying on an Arab party in government, making this selected pairing a current categorical veto.

    X · @AvigdorLibermanOpens in a new tab.YnetSource Language: HebrewOpens in a new tab.Sources:12345
  • Ra'amYashar (Eisenkot)

    Eisenkot rules out Ra'am

    On 26 September Eisenkot said Ra'am will not be part of the next government because it does not accept his conditions for partners, which include universal military or national service and recognizing Hamas as a terrorist organization that must be destroyed. After the vote, Abbas said Ra'am was willing to join an Eisenkot-led government once one was viable, while Eisenkot restated those conditions.

    Sources:1234567891011
  • Ra'amOtzma YehuditReligious Zionism-Zehut

    The far right rules out Ra'am

    The selected far-right party has explicitly ruled out a government that includes or depends on Ra'am.

    Sources:12345
  • Otzma YehuditYashar (Eisenkot)Together (Bennett-Lapid)

    The center rules out Ben Gvir

    The selected centrist or left-wing party has explicitly ruled out serving with Ben Gvir.

    Sources:12345678

Fault lines to manage

  • Religious Zionism-ZehutTogether (Bennett-Lapid)

    Bennett and Smotrich: a conditional veto

    Bennett says Smotrich is disqualified from serving under him unless he reverses the draft-exemption measures he championed; Smotrich keeps the Haredi parties as partners and backs a consent-based process.

    Sources:1234
  • Religious Zionism-ZehutYashar (Eisenkot)

    Eisenkot and Smotrich: conditions for partnership

    In an interview published 24 September, Eisenkot said he does not personally rule out Smotrich but cannot accept his support for a draft-exemption law. A partnership depends on meeting Yashar's conditions, including universal military or national service.

    Sources:1

Something went wrong

We couldn't complete that action. Check your connection and try again.